<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Breath-test manufacturer sued to release source code for devices</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bfwa.com/2008/03/04/breath-test-manufacturer-sued-to-release-source-code-for-devices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bfwa.com/2008/03/04/breath-test-manufacturer-sued-to-release-source-code-for-devices/</link>
	<description>We can help.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 13:00:07 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Breath-test manufacturer sued to release source code for devices</title>
		<link>http://bfwa.com/2008/03/04/breath-test-manufacturer-sued-to-release-source-code-for-devices/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Breath-test manufacturer sued to release source code for devices</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 16:43:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bfwa.com/2008/03/04/breath-test-manufacturer-sued-to-release-source-code-for-devices/#comment-32</guid>
		<description>[...] bfwebster had a pretty good blog post. Definitely worth your time. Here is a small excerpt:Judges in Minnesota have ruled — in over 100 cases — that drivers charged with DWI, as part of their defense, have a right to examine the source code of the breath-test machines used. Those rulings were upheld by the Minnesota Supreme &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] bfwebster had a pretty good blog post. Definitely worth your time. Here is a small excerpt:Judges in Minnesota have ruled — in over 100 cases — that drivers charged with DWI, as part of their defense, have a right to examine the source code of the breath-test machines used. Those rulings were upheld by the Minnesota Supreme &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
