<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The post-Bilski era begins</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bfwa.com/2008/12/19/the-post-bilski-era-begins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bfwa.com/2008/12/19/the-post-bilski-era-begins/</link>
	<description>We can help.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 13:00:07 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: US District Court Judge Throws Out Software Patent, Citing Bilski : Webster &#38; Associates LLC</title>
		<link>http://bfwa.com/2008/12/19/the-post-bilski-era-begins/comment-page-1/#comment-44</link>
		<dc:creator>US District Court Judge Throws Out Software Patent, Citing Bilski : Webster &#38; Associates LLC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 23:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bfwa.com/?p=86#comment-44</guid>
		<description>[...] (US 7,181,427) &#8212; for an automated credit application processing system &#8212; invalid due to the recent In re Bilski court decision that requires a patent to either involve &#8220;transformation&#8221; or &#8220;a specific [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (US 7,181,427) &#8212; for an automated credit application processing system &#8212; invalid due to the recent In re Bilski court decision that requires a patent to either involve &#8220;transformation&#8221; or &#8220;a specific [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: In re Bilski appealed to the Supreme Court : Webster &#38; Associates LLC</title>
		<link>http://bfwa.com/2008/12/19/the-post-bilski-era-begins/comment-page-1/#comment-42</link>
		<dc:creator>In re Bilski appealed to the Supreme Court : Webster &#38; Associates LLC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 18:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bfwa.com/?p=86#comment-42</guid>
		<description>[...] US Federal Court of Appeals ruling upholding the lower court decision for In re Bilski has now been appealed to the US Supreme Court: Not since 1981 has the Supreme Court undertaken to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] US Federal Court of Appeals ruling upholding the lower court decision for In re Bilski has now been appealed to the US Supreme Court: Not since 1981 has the Supreme Court undertaken to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boycott Novell &#187; Patents Roundup (US): Apple Sued, Government Intervenes, Patents Killed by Bilski</title>
		<link>http://bfwa.com/2008/12/19/the-post-bilski-era-begins/comment-page-1/#comment-41</link>
		<dc:creator>Boycott Novell &#187; Patents Roundup (US): Apple Sued, Government Intervenes, Patents Killed by Bilski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 15:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bfwa.com/?p=86#comment-41</guid>
		<description>[...] imaginary intellectual property, whose value is turning to that of just paper. Here is another new analysis of this &#8220;post-Bilski era&#8221;.  The In re Bilski (545 F.3d 943 [Fed. Cir. 2008]; here’s a PDF of the decision) court decision [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] imaginary intellectual property, whose value is turning to that of just paper. Here is another new analysis of this &#8220;post-Bilski era&#8221;.  The In re Bilski (545 F.3d 943 [Fed. Cir. 2008]; here’s a PDF of the decision) court decision [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
