Comments for Webster & Associates LLC

Comment on Readings in Software Engineering (RISE): a new series of posts by RISE: The Psychology of Computer Programming (Gerald M. Weinberg, 1971/1998) : Webster & Associates LLC

Tue, 22 May 2012 03:45:24 +0000

[...] [Part of an ongoing series of posts on "Readings in Software Engineering"] [...]

Comment on How not to handle a cold contact e-mail mistake by bfwebster

bfwebster — Fri, 11 Mar 2011 04:09:29 +0000

Glass houses, my friend. You’ve probably done more damage to your “career” by the publicity this debacle has garnered than you could possibly have expected.

Good luck in your future endeavors Bruce.

As promised, it’s now a year later. It’s been a remarkably busy and successful year, and I have multiple active cases even as I type this. The only “fallout” I’ve seen from this post has been a few e-mails from lawyer friends right after the link from “Above the Law” appeared congratulating me for the posting and the link. And, last I heard, the 3L was doing just fine. All’s well, and all that. ..bruce..

Comment on E-discovery and solid-state drives (SSDs) by But, wait! (More on SSDs and e-discovery) : Webster & Associates LLC

But, wait! (More on SSDs and e-discovery) : Webster & Associates LLC — Tue, 01 Mar 2011 18:23:10 +0000

[...] just last week I wrote a post on a report out of UCSD regarding difficulties in erasing data from solid-state disks (SSDs). But now out of Australia comes a somewhat contradictory report that some SSDs actually [...]

Comment on How not to handle a cold contact e-mail mistake by Networking: Creative Approaches « JETs with J.D.s

Networking: Creative Approaches « JETs with J.D.s — Mon, 24 May 2010 13:00:07 +0000

[...] snarky emails later, the third year walks away with nothing, embarrassed by the experience. The whole thing is worth a read, but this language from the consulting firm from the tail end of their interaction [...]

Comment on Pitfalls of Modern Software Engineering: an explanation by w. webster

w. webster — Sat, 03 Apr 2010 18:17:14 +0000

[...] webster Pitfalls of Modern Software Engineering: an explanation …Feb 27, 2008: from Pitfall: Thinking a new technology or methodology will solve all your IT problems [...]

Comment on The Sessions paper — an analytical critique by Investment analysis xls | Money Talks...

Investment analysis xls | Money Talks... — Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:01:48 +0000

[...] The Sessions paper â?? an analytical critique [...]

Comment on How not to handle a cold contact e-mail mistake by philsimon

philsimon — Fri, 26 Feb 2010 14:33:18 +0000

Bruce

I’m with you.

I’d be lying if I said that I never used “templates” back in the day when applying for W-2 jobs. I’ll also cop to making occasional mistakes.

Seems like an overreaction from the law student, although kudos to him for the apology.

Phil

Comment on How not to handle a cold contact e-mail mistake by Unpretentous Law Student

Unpretentous Law Student — Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:04:34 +0000

As a night law student, with about 8 years working in law firms, I have no sympathy for the 3L. Bruce, you handled the situation masterfully. Law students think that “finding a job” in a tough market is akin to having brain cancer. There are far harder tasks in the world. For anyone to be disrespectful to a complete stranger, ESPECIALLY WHEN AT FAULT, is simply childish. If this emmy award winner ever does land a job, they will will probably flame out, or be hated by everyone that has to work with/for them. I’m not a fan of many lawyers in general, or of the elitist atmosphere of the legal “practice.” Insolence and stupidity should be met by humor and sharp wit. Well done sir, well done.

Comment on How not to handle a cold contact e-mail mistake by College Tip: What Never to Admit, Even If You're Being Honest

College Tip: What Never to Admit, Even If You're Being Honest — Thu, 11 Feb 2010 22:58:39 +0000

[...] [...]

Comment on How not to handle a cold contact e-mail mistake by Legal Consultant

Legal Consultant — Thu, 11 Feb 2010 20:42:48 +0000

I am amazed at the replies here that criticize Bruce for telling the truth and trying to help 3L. Even if some people find Bruce’s response to 3L offensive (which I do not), your comments criticizing his skills, business acumen, and psychological needs are completely unwarranted. As someone who has recommended Bruce and worked with him as an expert in legal matters, I can tell you firsthand that his frank and forthright approach only enhances his credibility as an expert. If anyone is looking to play a game of one-upsmanship here, it is you who criticize and do nothing else to assist…