Subscribe via RSS Feed

Oops.

May 26, 2010 0 Comments
Oops.

Didn’t mean for things to be this quiet this long. I’m going to start posting more “pitfalls” at this point; stay tuned.

Continue Reading »

How not to handle a cold contact e-mail mistake

February 3, 2010 59 Comments
How <i>not</i> to handle a cold contact e-mail mistake

[Instalanche™ in progress, and I had no clue until I started getting e-mails about the post. I’ve gotten more hits today on this web site than I’ve had here in the past 12 months combined. Ah, the power of Instapundit — thanks, Glenn! Thanks also to Elie Mystal over at Above The Law for the […]

Continue Reading »

The Sessions paper — an analytical critique

December 28, 2009 1 Comment
The Sessions paper — an analytical critique

[cross-posted from brucefwebster.com] Roger Sessions has published a white paper, “The IT Complexity Crisis: Danger and Opportunity” (PDF). It’s created a bit of a stir in tech circles, largely because Sessions estimates that “worldwide, we are already losing over USD 500 billion per month on IT failure, and the problem is getting worse” (page 1; […]

Continue Reading »

US District Court Judge Throws Out Software Patent, Citing Bilski

July 9, 2009 0 Comments
US District Court Judge Throws Out Software Patent, Citing <i>Bilski</i>

US District Court Judge Andrew Gilford (Central District of California) granted a summary judgment motion (PDF, 47KB) in DealerTrack v. Huber et al., finding DealerTrack’s patent (US 7,181,427) — for an automated credit application processing system — invalid due to the recent In re Bilski court decision that requires a patent to either involve “transformation” […]

Continue Reading »

In re Bilski goes to the Supreme Court

June 1, 2009 1 Comment
<i>In re Bilski</i> goes to the Supreme Court

Just got word today that the US Supreme Court has granted certiorari to the In re Bilski matter regarding business software and process patents. Given the potential implications for new and existing patents, it should be interesting to see how the Supremes rule on this one.  ..bruce..

Continue Reading »